Piracy Act 1744

US privateers in the Revolutionary War. From the book A history of American privateers (1900) by Edgar Stanton Maclay.Under this act British subjects serving as privateers for an enemy of Great Britain could be tried for a felony not treason. It was easier to convict someone of a felony than prove treason. It was passed during the War of Austrian Succession waged from 1740 to 1748, in which Britain fought against France and Spain. As with many wars before, privateers were an integral part of the armed forces of all powers, and it would seem that British citizens regulary found employment with foreign powers.

An example of using privateers to support navies, occurred in 1744, when a British force of 300 men accompanied by two privateers from Saint Kitts successfully captured the French half of neighbouring Saint Martin. In late May 1745, two French royal frigates of 36 and 30 guns respectively under Commodore La Touché, together with three privateers sailed from Martinique to invade and capture the British colony of Anguilla in retaliation, but were repelled with heavy loss in the Battle of Anguilla.…

Piracy Act 1721

Merchant Ship off Shore, Samuel Atkins.This act’s longer title is: An Act for the more effectual suppressing of Piracy. Its aim was to counter the rapid growth of piracy in the early 18th century by removing some deficiencies in the preceding piracy laws. It was mainly concerned with those who dealt with and supported the pirates and other criminals, requiring commanders of vessels and others who traded with pirates or supplied them in any way to be treated as pirates themselves. The act included provisions for the confiscation of any ill-gotten cargo and the offending commander’s ship. It’s main aim was to undermined support for the pirates. The act was repealed on 5th November 1993.

Perpetual acts 1719

The full title of this act:

An Act for making perpetual so much of an Act made in the Tenth Year of the Reign of Queen Anne, for the reviving and continuing several Acts therein mentioned, as relates to the building and repairing County Gaols; and also an Act of the Eleventh and Twelfth Years of the Reign of King William the Third, for the more effectual Suppression of Piracy; and for making more effectual the Act of the Thirteenth Year of the Reign of King Charles the Second, intituled, “An Act for establishing Articles and Orders for the regulating and better Government of His Majesty’s Ships of War, and Forces by Sea.”

This act commenced on 23rd November 1719. Section 3 amends the Piracy Act 1698, which was about to expire, making it perpetual, as well as extending existing Vagrancy acts. It was repealed on 15th July 1867 by the Statute Law Revision Act.…

The Piracy Act 1717

The Piracy Act 1717 was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain. Its long title was “An Act for the further preventing Robbery, Burglary, and other Felonies, and for the more effectual Transportation of Felons, and unlawful Exporters of Wool; and for declaring the Law upon some Points relating to Pirates.”

Not only dealing with pirates, the act established a seven-year banishment to North America as a possible punishment for those convicted of lesser felonies, or as a possible sentence that capital punishment might be commuted to by royal pardon. Transportation of criminals to North America continued until 1776, when the American War of Independence made it unfeasible to carry out the practice. After that, felons were sentenced to be punished with imprisonment or hard labour instead. It wasn’t until 1787 that convicted convicts were transported to Australia, continuing until 1868.

Furthermore, it allowed courts to prosecute at their discretion either under civil law (The Suppression of Piracy Act 1698) or common law (Offences at Sea Act 1536).…

The Suppression of Piracy Act 1698

A sketch of the Capture of the El Mosquito from the book Historia de Puerto Rico, 1922.This act was passed during the reign of William III. The main purpose behind the statute was to make some corrections to the Offences at Sea Act 1536. These changes included allowing for acts of piracy to be “examined, inquired of, tried, heard and determined, and adjudged in any place at sea, or upon the land, in any of his Majesty’s islands, plantations, colonies, dominions, forts, or factories”. This enabled admirals to hold a court session to hear the trials of pirates in any place they deemed necessary, rather than requiring that the trial be held in England, thus avoiding the costly and time-consuming transport of captured pirates across the Atlantic. It also meant those accused of piracy didn’t necessarily have to be tried by a jury.